Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanilian Classification System
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:16, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sanilian Classification System[edit]
- Sanilian Classification System (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find video game sources: "Sanilian Classification System" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)
This article has no citations and is typed as if created by the creator of the classification system. There is not enough outside information. This is a project by a "student", and is original research. Surfer43 (talk) 01:09, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) czar · · 07:08, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as fully WP:OR. No reliable sources. Looks like someone's pet project. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 12:20, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per reasons above, plus its only Google hits are Wikipedia. WP:DUCK --Teancum (talk) 12:48, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete, no indication of significance. Someone seems to have just thought it up one day. 069952497aComments and complaintsStuff I've done 19:30, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as OR. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 01:25, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.